The distinction between a worker and an independent contractor has long been a contested issue in labour relations, often with significant consequences for both parties. Employers may classify individuals as contractors to avoid statutory obligations, while the said contractors may find themselves deprived of legal protections despite performing work that closely resembles employment. The Employment and Labour Relations Act addresses this challenge directly by introducing a presumption of employment, thereby shifting the focus from contractual labels to the reality of the working relationship.
The Act
Under the Employment and Labour Relations Act, section 151 establishes a clear and powerful legal presumption. It provides that any person who works for or renders a service to another person shall be presumed to be a worker of that person, unless it can be shown that the other party is a client or customer of a business genuinely carried on by the individual. This presumption applies regardless of the form of the contract or the designation used by the parties. In essence, calling someone a “consultant” or “independent contractor” does not, on its own, remove them from the protection of labour law.
The Act goes further by setting out specific factors that, if present, support the presumption that a person is a worker. These factors focus on control, dependency, and integration into the organisation. For example, where the manner in which a person works is subject to the control or direction of another, or where their hours of work are determined by that other person, the law is inclined to view the relationship as one of employment rather than independent contracting. Control over how, when, and where work is performed has traditionally been a hallmark of an employment relationship, and the Act reinforces this principle.
Another critical factor is integration, where the person’s work forms an integral part of the organisation. This suggests that the individual is not operating an independent business but is instead contributing to the core functions of the employer. Similarly, where a person has worked an average of at least forty hours per month over a period of three months or more, the continuity and regularity of the relationship point towards employment rather than a once-off or project-based engagement.
Lastly, the Act speaks of economic dependency. The Act recognises that where a person is economically dependent on the other party for whom they work, the imbalance of power and reliance resembles that of an employee rather than an independent contractor. This is reinforced where the person is provided with tools of trade or work equipment, or where they only work for or render services to one entity. These circumstances undermine the notion that the individual is running a genuinely independent business with multiple clients and financial autonomy.
The practical effect of section 151 is significant. Once one or more of the listed factors are present, the burden shifts to the employer to prove that the individual is, in fact, an independent contractor and that the relationship is one of client and business. This represents a deliberate policy choice to protect vulnerable workers and to prevent the misclassification of employment relationships.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the Employment and Labour Relations Act strengthen the legal framework governing worker classification by prioritising substance over form. By presuming employment where certain factors are present, the law promotes fairness, accountability, and compliance, while discouraging artificial arrangements designed to circumvent labour protections.
Contacts
If you want to join our free HR WhatsApp group or to consult, contact us on:
Gaborone: +267 75 546 784, +267 393 9435 or info@aupracontax.co.bw
Maun: +267 74 037 833, +267 686 0117 or tax5@aupracontax.co.bw
