The Employment and Labour Relations Act introduce an important safeguard in the regulation of working hours where commuted overtime is paid. Commuted overtime refers to a fixed allowance paid to a worker in lieu of calculating and paying overtime on an hourly basis. This is not a new concept in the world of employment. For many years, employers have used commuted overtime allowances as a practical way of compensating workers in supervisory, technical, and operational roles where working hours may fluctuate, and precise overtime tracking is impractical. However, the law now makes it clear that the payment of a commuted overtime allowance does not give an employer unrestricted authority to demand excessive working hours from a worker.
The Act
Section 214(10) of the Employment and Labour Relations Act states that, where commuted overtime is paid, a worker shall not be required to work excess hours that are not commensurate with the allowance paid. This means there must be a reasonable relationship between the overtime allowance and the additional hours expected of the worker. The allowance is therefore not a blanket waiver of the worker’s right to reasonable working hours, and the wording used under this section is deliberate and protective.
This provision addresses a long-standing abuse in some workplaces where employers pay a modest commuted overtime allowance and then routinely require workers to work excessively long hours, including weekends and public holidays, without further compensation. Section 214(10) closes this loophole by introducing a proportionality test. Employers must now be able to justify that the extra hours required are fairly covered by the commuted overtime allowance paid.
The concept of “commensurate” is central to this section. It implies fairness, balance, and reasonableness. If a worker receives a commuted overtime allowance intended to cover, for example, occasional extended hours, it would be unlawful to require that worker to consistently work extreme or unpredictable hours far beyond what the allowance reasonably compensates. In such cases, the employer may be exposed to claims for unpaid overtime, breach of statutory working hours, or unfair labour practices.
The Employer and a worker
From a worker’s perspective, section 214(10) reinforces the principle that remuneration must align with workload. The payment of a fixed allowance does not strip workers of protection against exploitation or fatigue. Excessive working hours have implications for health, safety, productivity, and work-life balance, and this section recognises that financial compensation alone cannot justify unreasonable demands on a worker’s time.
For employers, the section imposes a duty of careful structuring and monitoring. Commuted overtime arrangements must be clearly defined, realistic, and regularly reviewed. Employers should specify what the allowance is intended to cover, ensure that actual working hours remain within reasonable limits, and adjust the allowance where operational demands increase. Failure to do so may render the arrangement unlawful, even if it was contractually agreed.
Conclusion
In conclusion, The Act affirms that commuted overtime is a tool for flexibility, not exploitation. While employers may lawfully pay a fixed overtime allowance, they remain bound by the obligation to ensure that excess hours worked are reasonable and proportionate to that allowance. The section reinforces dignity, fairness, and accountability in the management of working time, making it clear that commuted overtime does not place unlimited labour at the employer’s disposal and further indicates that, even where a worker has agreed to commuted overtime, the law intervenes to prevent imbalance and abuse. Remember consent does not override statutory protection.
Contacts
If you want to join our free HR WhatsApp group or to consult, contact us on:
Gaborone: +267 75 546 784, +267 393 9435 or info@aupracontax.co.bw
Maun: +267 74 037 833, +267 686 0117 or tax5@aupracontax.co.bw
